AgentPlix

Your guide to AI agents, automation frameworks, and the tools shaping the future of work.
AI Engineering

Cut Claude API Costs 50% with a Self-Modifying Agent

I Cut Claude API Costs by 50% Using a Self-Modifying Agentic System My Claude API bill hit $340 in a single month. The system I was running was doing what it was supposed to do—processing thousands of tasks per day, generating content, classifying inputs, drafting responses—but the cost curve was pointing straight up and I had no clear way to bend it without sacrificing quality. So I built something that fights back: a self-modifying agentic loop that analyzes each incoming task, routes it to the cheapest model capable of handling it, compresses the context window before every call, and caches repeated prompt structures using Anthropic’s native caching API. The result was a 50% reduction in monthly API spend with zero degradation in output quality on the tasks that mattered. ...

May 5, 2026 · Sam Okafor
AI Engineering

RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Which AI Approach Wins?

RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Which AI Approach Is Actually Right for Your Project? Every developer building on top of an LLM hits the same wall eventually. The base model is impressive, but it doesn’t know your data, doesn’t match your tone, and occasionally confidently hallucinates facts your users will immediately recognize as wrong. The two dominant solutions are retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and fine-tuning, and picking the wrong one can cost you weeks of engineering time and thousands of dollars. This guide cuts through the hype to tell you exactly which approach fits your use case. ...

April 29, 2026 · Morgan Chen